I don't care that I disturbed your small party here in taking Taem's opinion apart... as this is neither your thread nor your forum.Dr.Disaster wrote:I don't care what your opinion is about his conclusion because i'm not interested in it therefore did not comment on it.badhabit wrote:Read to what I was referring in his post: to his conclusion, to which I agree and brought examples.Dr.Disaster wrote: Read what he is talking about.
Read what I am talking about with him.
Check what you add to that.
You jumped into a discussion on balance changes Taem likes to see and my take of it, then you virtually littered it with stuff no-one has asked for or stuff from other game systems which are naturally not present in LoG2. Also the points cooldowns and spell damage of OUR discussion which YOU finally(!) adressed got littered by foreign game system details without looking on Taem's overall requests which are "lowering cooldowns" and "add scaling to spell damage".
Despite you, I agree with most points of Taem and his general impression of LoG as not as good polished as the classics from the old days. That you instantly started to defend furiously the current situation as "(mostly) great" was to expect and need therefore a counterweight.