Grimrock

I dont think the game was designed to "PUT ALL 50 POINTS IN A SKILL! NOW!" then rinse and repeat for another skill... I think they designed it for you to even out your skillpoints into skills that build up your character, which is what i did: Okay this guy here is the tank, so i'll want h...

Thanks!

When your characters get quick enough, and if you play with mages and need to constantly "dial" spells, a nice trick is to have all your attack actions in the "middle square" so you can access them more quickly. Lets say (front row 2 fighters, back row two mages): Shield|Sword Ax...

Meh. Tried it, don't like it. Combat takes too long with only one character, and is less difficult as you can take your time. Boring. I prefer short and frantic combats where you have to maximise your actions while strafing. Much more exiting.

Oh well, to each his own, I guess.

I would buy it for sure.

A new dungeon, say one or two new classes (with new skills), more items and monsters, one or two new wall textures and a couple of spells.

The engine is fine, just bring more content!

Does the level 12 Assassination perk allows you to attack from the back row with unarmed attacks? I ask because the description states that you can attack with melee weapons , but does not specify if you can do it while unarmed. Because if so, I'm totally going for a back row strengh minotaur rogue ...

Please use spoiler tags, and no, you got 2 inverted.

Disasterrific wrote:I don't know if it was a conscious decision but tucking away the automap button also discourages you from hammering on it the whole time.

Tab. Yeah, sorry, now you won't be able to resist Muahahahaha!

Well, I guess I'll just give her a shield and boost her evasion even more then.

I understand the "one attack at the time" thing, but I would have had considered giving 1/2 the attack bonus of the off-hand dagger. Oh well! Live and learn.

Yes, I am aware, but I play with two mages, so the rogue will stay in the front.